Большой передел мира
267,192,031
522,381
|
DeC ( Профессионал ) |
| 23 янв 2020 12:18:34 |
Бидон!!!
новая дискуссия Дискуссия 134
Байден отрекся от поддержи Силиконовой долины: объявил, что немедленно введет в соцсетях цензуру, отменив правило "площадка за размещенный контент не отвечает".
Хе... Хозяева Интернета ради спасения своей задницы и Берни в потусы протащить решатся.
The idea that it’s a tech company is that Section 230 should be revoked, immediately should be revoked, number one. For Zuckerberg and other platforms.Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act says that online platforms aren’t held liable for things their users post on them, with some exceptions. In July, The Times’s Sarah Jeong weighed in on proposed updates to Section 230, arguing that “we should reopen the debate on C.D.A. 230 only because so much of the internet has changed,” but “the discourse will be improved if we all take a moment to actually read the text of C.D.A. 230.”
CW: That’s a pretty foundational laws of the modern internet.
That’s right. Exactly right. And it should be revoked. It should be revoked because it is not merely an internet company. It is propagating falsehoods they know to be false, and we should be setting standards not unlike the Europeans are doing relative to privacy. You guys still have editors. I’m sitting with them. Not a joke. There is no editorial impact at all on Facebook. None. None whatsoever. It’s irresponsible. It’s totally irresponsible.
Opinion | Joe Biden Argues Age Is Just a Number - The New York Times
Хе... Хозяева Интернета ради спасения своей задницы и Берни в потусы протащить решатся.
The idea that it’s a tech company is that Section 230 should be revoked, immediately should be revoked, number one. For Zuckerberg and other platforms.Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act says that online platforms aren’t held liable for things their users post on them, with some exceptions. In July, The Times’s Sarah Jeong weighed in on proposed updates to Section 230, arguing that “we should reopen the debate on C.D.A. 230 only because so much of the internet has changed,” but “the discourse will be improved if we all take a moment to actually read the text of C.D.A. 230.”
CW: That’s a pretty foundational laws of the modern internet.
That’s right. Exactly right. And it should be revoked. It should be revoked because it is not merely an internet company. It is propagating falsehoods they know to be false, and we should be setting standards not unlike the Europeans are doing relative to privacy. You guys still have editors. I’m sitting with them. Not a joke. There is no editorial impact at all on Facebook. None. None whatsoever. It’s irresponsible. It’s totally irresponsible.
Opinion | Joe Biden Argues Age Is Just a Number - The New York Times
ОТВЕТЫ (1)
|
xrvr ( Специалист ) |
| 23 янв 2020 15:39:34 |
Цитата: DeC от 23.01.2020 12:18:34
У Байдена уже немного нервишки сдают.
Репортер спросил его несколько раз подряд, почему он атакует Сандерса, тот в ответ:
Why why why why why why why why why!